JH 1, the first stain, was a handprint that had one of Susan's fingerprints in it.
JH 2, the second stain, was a handprint with no identifiable fingerprints in it.
MSN 14, the third stain, was a smear near the light switch.

After trial the stains were sent to Prof Brinkman in Germany for analysis, see his 'Table of Results' below. JH 1, the stain with the fingerprint, does not appear because it did not test positive for blood, see attached letter.

MSN 14, the third stain, tested positive for the blood of the deceased. No photographic evidence from the first morning exists relating to this stain.

JH 2, the second stain, was in two envelopes, the contents of one tested negative and are not shown on the table. The samples in the second envelope appear at '13' on the table. The '(Paint flakes)' sample tested negative. For the '(Swabbings)' sample, in 1996, at the time of the tests, Brinkman, for the defence and Clayton, for the prosecution, agreed that the weak (9, 10) reading at F13B should be disregarded and 'negative' should be recorded as the test result.

For the Nov. 2001 appeal Clayton changed his mind, saying, "Not withstanding the presence of unspecific ladder bands" '(LB)', the '(9, 10)' result meant that JH 2 was from a higher primate/human source. No argument was brought to counter this statement. It should have been argued that the presence of the ladder bands made the test results unreliable because seven out of the eight (LB) readings on the table had occurred where no amplification product was expected. I.e. at 11, MSN 15 (Swabbing), which is a negative control sample where no results should be obtained, ladder band readings are present. The tests at this point are unsafe.

Just prior to the Brinkman tests the police scientists at FSS Weatherby had also found JH 1, the first stain, to test negative for blood.

The above demonstrates the weakness of the case against Susan May.

That the stains were made at the time of the murder is only speculation because there is no forensic test in existence that can confirm the age of dry blood.

Contemporaneous notes have been surreptitiously amended by adding the position of the three stains to a sketch plan and the blood test records relating to all three stains, purporting to be tests done on that first day, have been falsified. The prosecution asked, at the last appeal, that the chief forensic expert's evidence be withdrawn.

After Susan had become the prime suspect a forth stain was found on the same wall that was said to have been there prior to the murder.

We ask all people of influence, in the name of Truth, Justice and Common Sense, not to be confined but to come together to generate the legal means to bring about the release of this innocent woman.